Archive for the ‘For Students’ Category

African-American: Black + Tall + Male = Basketball?

Thursday, November 20th, 2008

written by Liz Dwyer, Anti-Racist Parent columnist

My seven year-old son is very tall for his age. He’s been in the 90th percentile for height his whole life. He’s also African-American. It seems like in our country, Black + Tall + Male = having to constantly hear, “You better put him in basketball! He could be the next Kobe Bryant or Michael Jordan.”

Yes, if you’re a tall, African-American boy, you are destined to be a basketball player.

Never mind that he’d rather spend his time at a science center, and never mind that if you ask him what sport he really wants to play, he’ll tell you football because his grandpa works at Notre Dame.

Even though he could have begun playing in our local sports leagues when he was five, I was reluctant to register him because I didn’t want to feed into the stereotype that the only thing of value in an African-American boy is athletic ability. But, when he turned six he begged to play soccer. I felt a little like I was putting my own baggage about sports and black males onto him, so I signed him up.

No one assumed that he knew how to play at all, and the coaches emphasized that the goal was exposure to the sport. However, I noticed that the performance expectations seemed to be much higher for the Latino boys on his team than it was for him. One Latina mother explained to me that it was because soccer is so much more popular in Latin America. She claimed that Latino fathers give their children soccer balls before they can walk. Clearly, this seemed like questionable stereotyping to me, but I found the sentiment echoed quite frequently by other parents.

When the soccer season came to a close, it only seemed natural to move my son on to the next sport, basketball. He was assigned to a team and it quickly became clear that he was the tallest kid on it. He was also the only black child in the entire division. I can’t begin to tell you how excited his coach was. “Come on over here! You’re going to be our rock star.”

I was immediately irritated. I found myself sitting in the bleachers, watching the first practice and thinking, “That coach only said my son’s a rock star because he thinks that since my boy’s black, he knows how to play.” The truth of the matter was that up till then, my son had only played basketball a couple of times. My husband never played competitive sports so it doesn’t come natural to him to toss a basketball or football around every day. I was a cheerleader, not a basketball player, and quite frankly, his learning to read above grade level has been our top priority, not sports.

The very first game of the season, my son scored three baskets and led his team to victory. Afterwards, the coach gushed about my son, saying, “He’s really got some natural talent there.”

I wanted to ask, “What do you mean ‘natural talent’?” but before I knew it, the coach was talking to another parent.

Even though it feels like black folks are always treated like they’re naturals at sports, dancing, singing, joke-telling and hip-hop, I again asked myself if I was reading too much into such a comment. Was this coach just being complimentary or did he assume that blackness = basketball like everybody else?

As the weeks passed, it became clear that my son was not the best shooter on the team. Making three baskets in the first game was a bit of beginner’s luck. But, one of his Latino teammates managed to hit 80% of his baskets. Instead, because of his height, my son became the king of rebounds. Needless to say, they won every game and my son genuinely enjoyed playing on the team.

This year we were out of town and so we missed soccer registration, but back at the beginning of August, the guy working in the recreation center office made sure to mention that basketball registration would be happening in November.

Again, I found myself wondering, am I only being told this because the guy behind the desk figures a black kid will like basketball more, or does he genuinely not want my son to miss out?

It made me realize that this is one of the most insidious things about racism: It takes a psychological toll on you since you constantly have to turn this stuff over in your head. The vigilance it requires to be sure my son is not being treated in a prejudicial manner gets exhausting. I don’t like having to wonder whether something I’m told or the way my boy is treated is a symptom of either conscious or subconscious racism.

Come to think of it, one of the reasons I like my son’s pediatrician so much is that after checking my son’s vision, the doctor said to him that he has such perfect eyesight that he could be an airline pilot. The doctor never says, “Wow, you’re tall! You should be a ball player!” I wish no one else did either.

Liz Dwyer lives in Los Angeles with her husband of eight years, Elarryo Bolden and her two sons, ages six and three. Her great sense of adventure and desire to learn about diverse cultures took her to Guangzhou, China where she taught English to third and fourth graders, picked up some Mandarin, and managed to get into seven bike accidents. Liz taught in Compton, CA for three years and later worked for national education non-profit Teach For America. Liz has written and reflected on the world around her for the past three years at Los Angelista’s Guide to the Pursuit of Happiness. She’s currently freelance writing and working on her first novel.

Image courtesy of Balakov on Flickr
(antiracistparent)

USA: Thank you God for protecting us from Sarah Palin

Friday, November 7th, 2008

sarahI’m thousands of words behind in NaNoWriMo, but I can’t concentrate because DUUUUDES! Obama won and hope fills the air even though all of this Pacific Northwest rain is knocking it down and running it down the street and into the gigantic storm drain on the curb in front of our house.

I will hold the Tuesday night moment close to my heart for a very long time.

I should be packing for my trip to daughter’s home in Appleton. I should be cleaning the bedroom: dusting furniture, vacuuming, cleaning the toilet, putting clean laundry away but I am too wrapped up in news reports about who Obama will pick for his staff and why.

Do you think that Sarah Palin really didn’t know that Africa was a continent? An impromptu prayer: Thank you God for protecting us from Sarah Palin. A lot of Your faithful think she was an answer to their prayers, and maybe she is a good and faithful follower of Yours (but if she is, why did she buy all of those expensive clothes? Doesn’t she know that scripture about the little sparrows?) I can clearly see that You knew she needed to serve you quietly in Alaska. Thank you again and again. I mean it. Make sure she stays real quiet okay? We need Your help because some of us don’t think we could take even one more day of that voice.

It won’t stop raining and two more storms are on their way. I don’t think we’ll know when one storm ends and another begins. I’m going to light a fire soon. This kind of night after a long and wet day calls for fire – and coffee. With any luck there’s Kahlua in the house.

Want to: change the sheets, dust the furniture, put the mess away. Put things in drawers, scrub the toilet. Clean the bathroom countertop and the floor. Vacuum. I often list things I want to do and then, feeling satisfied, never do them.

Do you think Joe Lieberman’s days are numbered? Didn’t he recently say he fears for the country if the Democrats got 60 seats in the Senate? Why, yes he did. He certainly did.

Important Goal: By November 15, Etsy will be up and running (and don’t you think it’s about time?). I won’t make cute little zippered bags, I promise. Loads of zippered bags on Etsy. No jewelry either. No doll clothes. Nothing involving tags. No magnets. Well there it is, at least I’ve clarified what won’t be there. No monster dolls either. Not one single zombie or anything made of felted stuff. Nothing knitted, nor anything with googly eyes.

But what will I do? Oh….stuff. Beautiful, happy, sunshine-filled stuff. A wise person told me that if I love it and it speaks to my soul, then it’s worth offering, so I’ll offer and it doesn’t sell, I’ll give it away. I’ll have Twitter polls and winner will win from the spoils.

Time to dust.

(babushkablue)

USA: The World congratulates Obama

Thursday, November 6th, 2008

obamaChinese President Hu Jintao, shortly after Barack Obama was declared president-elect, sent a message Wednesday (5 Nov) to congratulate Obama on his election victory.

“China and the United States share broad common interests and important responsibilities on a wide range of major issues concerning the well-being of humanity.

“Developing long-term, healthy and stable Sino-US relations serves the fundamental interests of both countries and peoples, and is of great significance to peace, stability and development in the world,” Hu said in a message.

Hu said the Chinese government and he himself have always valued China-US relations.

“In the new historic era, I look forward to working with you to continuously strengthen dialogue and exchanges between our two countries and enhance mutual trust and cooperation on the basis of the three Sino-US Joint Communiques, with a view to taking our relationship to a new high and bringing greater benefits to people of our two countries and the rest of the world.”

Premier Wen Jiabao, in his congratulatory message to Obama, said “a sound China-US relationship meets the common aspirations of our two peoples and the need to maintain peace, stability and prosperity in the Asia-Pacific region and the world at large”.

Wen expressed belief that with joint efforts, the China-US relationship would make new progress.

Vice-President Xi Jinping congratulated Joe Biden on his election as US vice-president.

Following are quotes from other world leaders on Obama’s victory:

Dmitry Medvedev, Russian President

“Russia hopes Barack Obama’s administration will take steps to improve badly-damaged bilateral ties and make a choice in favor of full-fledged relations with Russia.”

Nicolas Sarkozy, French president

“With the world in turmoil and doubt, the American people, faithful to the values that have always defined America’s identity, have expressed with force their faith in progress and the future. At a time when we must face huge challenges together, your election has raised enormous hope in France, in Europe and beyond.”

Gordon Brown, British Prime Minister

“Barack Obama ran an inspirational campaign, energising politics with his progressive values and his vision for the future. I know Barack Obama and we share many values. We both have determination to show that government can act to help people fairly through these difficult times facing the global economy.”

Jose Manuel Barroso, European Commission President

“We need to change the current crisis into a new opportunity. We need a new deal for a new world. I sincerely hope that with the leadership of President Obama, the United States of America will join forces with Europe to drive this new deal. For the benefit of our societies, for the benefit of the world.”

Manmohan Singh, Indian Prime Minister

“Your extraordinary journey to the White House will inspire people not only in your country but also around the world.”

Taro Aso, Japanese Prime Minister

“The Japan-US alliance is key to Japanese diplomacy and it is the foundation for peace and stability in the Asia-Pacific region. With President-elect Obama, I will strengthen the Japan-US alliance further and work toward resolving global issues such as the world economy, terror and the environment.”

Kgalema Motlanthe, South African President

“Africa, which today stands proud of your achievements, can only but look forward to a fruitful working relationship with you both at bilateral and multilateral levels in our endeavor to create a better world for all who live in it.”

Kevin Rudd, Australian Prime Minister

“Senator Obama’s message of hope is not just for America’s future, it is also a message of hope for the world as well.”

Mwai Kibaki, Kenyan President

“We the Kenyan people are immensely proud of your Kenyan roots. Your victory is not only an inspiration to millions of people all over the world, but it has special resonance with us here in Kenya.” (China Daily/ ANN)

MySinchew 2008.11.06

Humour: John McCain will be sent to Kenya to serve as a President.

Tuesday, November 4th, 2008

unThis was announced by the recently formed UN Presidential Exchange Program (PEP). Kenya was a natural choice for McCain since Barak Obama’s father came from Kenya. It was also judged to be the best country to show off McCain’s skills in cleaning up corruption and reducing taxes to zero (wealthy Kenyans already pay little tax and the poor are too poor to pay). His military skills can come handy on a continent racked by constant wars.

The UN PEP office also announced that Sarah Palin will exchange places with Vladimir Putin (a neighbor she often waves to from her porch). However, PEP later issued a correction saying that due to her poor knowledge of geography Sarah agreed to go only as far as Siberia. Siberian natives were overjoyed, saying that the moose hunting season had just begun. Mr Putin was judged to be too risky for Alaska as it contains mineral resources that the Russian oligarchs might covet. He will be sent instead to Tonga to boost the tourist potential of the flagging, and sinking, island economy.

The North Korean President Kim Jong Il will be sent to run Guantanamo Bay Jail. After a year, he will be locked in with inmates for a night of conflict resolution training.

Arnold Schwarzenegger will go to Pakistan to terminate Osama Bin Laden.

Big Al Greeenspan will be sent to China to ruin the Chinese economy.

French President Sarkozy and the German President Angela Merkel will swap places. Sarkozy was judged to be the best person to improve German cuisine and fashion while Merkel promised to tackle trade unions, slim down overblown French bureaucracy, and impose order on the inevitable student protests.

President Bush will be dispatched to Albania to help run a home for retarded children.

President Clinton will go to the South East Asia as a goodwill ambassador to clean up the sex trade there.

Hilary Clinton will be sent to Saudi Arabia to create at least one crack in the glass ceiling of male dominance there. She will be equipped with a crash helmet.

Italian President Silvio Berlusconi will be sent to India as it was judged to be the only country that would continue on its way, no matter who you sent there.

Note: There will be a video announcement on Youtube and Blip.tv at 5:00pm Tuesday (EST) – Time.

Keywords: McCain, Kenya, UN, Presidential Exchange Program, comedy

(pyotrpatrushev)

Football

Monday, October 27th, 2008

Africa: Africa and Mathematics

Thursday, September 4th, 2008

africa

Emeagwali won the 1989 Gordon Bell Prize, which has been called “supercomputing’s Nobel Prize,” for inventing a formula that allows computers to perform their fastest computations - a discovery that inspired the reinvention of supercomputers. He was extolled by then U.S. President Bill Clinton as “one of the great minds of the Information Age” and described by CNN as “a Father of the Internet;” and is the most searched-for scientist on the Internet.


africa

Isaac Asimov, the most prolific science writer, acknowledges that mathematics, science and technology are the gift of ancient Africans to our modern world.


africa

The first draft of a portrait that depicted Emeagwali as a supercomputer wizard driving a carriage powered by thousands of chickens (a metaphor for his 65,000 weak processors that performed the world’s fastest computation). The “Negro Emeagwali” (shown in this illustration) was rejected and replaced with a “Caucasian Emeagwali” (shown below).


A “whitened” Caucasian portrait of Emeagwali was acceptable and widely published. One illustrator argued that Emeagwali has a trace of Caucasian blood and said that he could see the “Caucasian look” in his face.


Jefferson wrote in his book “Notes on Virginia” that Africans are intellectually inferior and cannot understand mathematics.


GHANA

This false portrait of Euclid as a white male reinforced Jefferson’s views that mathematics could only be comprehended by whites. Since there is no proof that Euclid ever travelled outside Africa it makes sense to assume that he is full-blooded Negro.


(www.emeagwali.com)

Africa: Firefox Translated Into Ugandan Language

Tuesday, August 19th, 2008

Edris Kisambira
Kampala

AfricaA two-day translation marathon has resulted in a version of Mozilla’s Firefox browser Firefox in Luganda, Uganda’s most widely spoken language.

The software will be made available by Makerere University’s Faculty of Computing and Information Technology (CIT) with the aim of giving non-English speakers a browsing tool.

Software experts from Translate.org.za, a South African company that develops translation software, guided and trained 300 students from CIT as well as Luganda linguists from the Institute of Languages at Makerere in the translation exercise.

During the two days, experts from Rhodes University and Translate.org.za introduced participants to localization practices to speed the process.

A CD that contains a translated Firefox interface will now be distributed by CIT for a small fee to cover administrative costs while an electronic version will be placed on the CIT Web site for interested users to download. Friedel Wolff from Translate.org.za said that work remains to be done on the browser.

“There is now a Firefox browser that is 80 percent Luganda but the local community with help from CIT needs to continue to work on it to do some improvements before it is disseminated,” Wolff said.

In 2004, seven volunteers spent a year and half translating the older version of Firefox but the application was upgraded before they could distribute the translation.

Africa’s academic community has emphasized the importance of supporting local content and languages online in order to reach the rural population, given that the continent is home to hundreds of languages.

Professor Venansius Baryamureeba, the head of the CIT faculty, said there is now a need to develop online content in Luganda, and that the software development department at CIT is interested in continuing with the translation work.

“We have got the skills and are now in a position to be able to translate Firefox and other software into other indigenous languages,” Baryamureeba said. “And we will do this because we want to contribute to narrowing the so-called digital divide.”

Lorenzo Dalvit, a lecturer from the department of ICT at Rhodes University, said it was a great experience but also a lot of work for the team that did the translations.

At Rhodes, the university administration and Translate.org.za have initiated a project that is helping translate software in use within the university into non-English languages

(ALLAFRICA)

China-Africa: Is the West ready to share with China and India ?

Monday, August 18th, 2008

china -africa

In 1884, at the request of Portugal, German chancellor Bismark called together the major western powers for a talk on a negotiated solution to the questions over the control of Africa which 80% of territory was still under traditional and local control. Bismark wanted to expand Germany’s sphere of influence over Africa but have seen dangerous the fact that western powers were struggling with one another for territory.

Fourteen countries (Denmark, Austria-Hungary, Belgium, France, Germany, Great Britain, Italy, the Netherlands,Russia, Portugal, Spain, Sweden-Norway, Turkey, and the United States of America) participated to that conference and four of them (France, Germany, Great Britain, and Portugal) were the major players in the conference, already controlling about 20% of Africa at the time.

The conference obtained the neutrality of Congo and Niger Rivers mouths and basins and they were opened to trade for all the Colons. However, despite its neutrality, part of the Congo Basin became a personal kingdom for Belgium’s King Leopold II ( and was named Leopoldville : meaning Leopold’s Town) and under his rule, over half of the region’s African population died.

Even after the conference, the same give and take continued depending on the influence a country was gaining or losing. The map above is 30 years after the Berlin conference European powers claims, they had fully divided Africa among themselves into fifty countries

  • Great Britain desired a Cape-to-Cairo collection of colonies and almost succeeded though their control of Egypt, Sudan (Anglo-Egyptian Sudan), Uganda, Kenya (British East Africa), South Africa, and Zambia, Zimbabwe (Rhodesia), and Botswana. The British also controlled Nigeria and Ghana (Gold Coast).
  • France took much of western Africa, from Mauritania to Chad (French West Africa) and Gabon and the Republic of Congo (French Equatorial Africa).
  • Belgium and King Leopold II controlled the Democratic Republic of Congo (Belgian Congo).
  • Portugal took Mozambique in the east and Angola in the west.
  • Italy’s holdings were Somalia (Italian Somaliland) and a portion of Ethiopia.
  • Germany took Namibia (German Southwest Africa) and Tanzania (German East Africa).
  • Spain claimed the smallest territory - Equatorial Guinea (Rio Muni).

You can see that some of the participants such as USA don’t have any claims in Africa, at least that what the map tells us. I wonder what their part was or if they wanted just to waste their time ( 3 months of negotiations) negotiating something they didn’t want.

More than 100 hundred years after the Bismark conference more super powers have emerged and of course want exactly what the former wanted and Africa is on the Agenda.

Africa is now meant to be independent, and more than 50 African countries are members of the UN. Their masters are now called partners. They didn’t easily give up their title of masters but have lost it after long fights. They are now called partners and not masters but you don’t need to be a politician expert to notice than they don’t act differently. Even a software engineer like me knows that Africa is not yet independent.

With China and India economies booming, Africa, the continent which have been fueling all the economies: USA and Europe from the slave trade era to the modern era, is for sure still needed for help and ready than ever. However, Africa is already divided and the traditional super powers have already traced their borders.

The world economy is exactly in the situation of 1884 when emerging industries were in luck of enough raw materials. China and India are in need of the food of their machines and Africa had got plenty of them.

China, which has been seeking relationship with Africa since the Mao’s era, has recently boosted it’s cooperation with Africa. It’s worth mentioning that Chinese cooperation with Africa is not matter of yesterday as one would think when reading news around internet. It’s just recently that we are being told all the time about the “disastrous China-Africa cooperation” by western media.

Even though China-Africa cooperation is not a matter of yesterday as I said previously, it’s just recently that we are being told frequently that : China is invading Africa, China is devouring African resources, Congolese kids are dying mining for Chinese companies, China is giving weapons to Mugabe and Sudan to kill Africans and many more. China have been in Africa a long time ago but was not a treat to the masters’ interest in any how. However now days, building on the long time relationship it had already with Africa, China has aggressively and quickly used it’s friendship with Africa to get economic interests and many deals are being signed despite the cries from West.

In the modern worlds, every country is meant to have right to choose its partners and West have lost the title of Master. They are supposed to be and are called Partners and not masters even tough they play the later.

The West now have two choices:

- Give up Africa and leave it with China and concentrate to their own economies. They have had enough time ( more than 100 years) to steal Africa and it would not be surprising that Belgium has now more gold than it’s colony : Congo. In terms of raw materials, I don’t doubt that Europe has enough stock for their industries for decades to come.

The consequences would arise if China managed to help Africa develop itself without the West: I don’t want this to happen just for the sake of international security. Imagine Africa as a world power without any help from Europe with the history of slave trade and colonization and all the killings of African nationalists that followed and all the made in Europe civil wars . I don’t want to have an image of a bad, criminal, bandit, … white man because really it’s not true. I’ve got very good white friends and I can say they wouldn’t be unhappy to hear Africa is developing. Even though I fearlessly can affirm that the Evil of Africa is white, I have not doubt that the White is not the Evil of Africa.

-A second choice is to really engage Europe in the development of Africa : that would be very good. Africans would easily forget their history and treat the West as a Partner not as an enemy. The current generations of Europe would have reason to reject the responsibility of their ancestors actions arguing that they would have acted differently if they’ve born before the slave trade like we do when blaming those criminal who killed Jesus. Who would not benefit from that ? None.

The consequences of the ideal solution are two:

* That would mean investing money, I mean money and not the aid, not financing unproductive made in Europe projects. That would come to a cost but there is no doubt that the West is able to handle it.They have got enough to invest and much of the benefits would still go to them.

* An other alternative that I think would not be with less consequences, is the independence of Africa. Africa would then seek economic and political independence. Imagine an Africa with nothing to report to the World Bank or the IMF and a decision maker in World Trade organization. Europe would find itself in situation of one of African partners like China and India. Africa would cease being just a natural resources provider but a hub of heavy industries. The cost of natural resources would rise and the European industries face the treat of cheap African goods on their market in application of their own rules of World Trade Organization. With the experience they have with China I don’t think they are ready to accept that.

Unable to stop China “Invading” Africa, they have lost their mind as you can see in this video, and they are now fighting on two fronts:

- Demonizing China however and whenever they can: we are now being told whatever about how Chinese actions in Africa is disastrous. We are told of a China “devouring” Africa and sponsoring dictatorship in Africa, undermining the “good efforts” of promoting good governance and democracy from the West. A Congolese kid mining is mining for Chinese companies, a gun which shoots innocents is made is China, …. the very very very very … bad China. However we all know that China is not the first supplier of Africa in any thing but infrastructures. I don’t say and even doubt that Chinese sell weapons in Africa. But unless those made in West are made in way they recognize innocents and only kill bad guys, they should not be the first to criticize it.

However this is doomed to fail: Chinese don’t care of the cries from the West and are on their way to Congo, Angola to name two, building roads and all kind of infrastructures quickly and silently. You see a bad Chinese enemy of Africa and a good European friend of Africa on the net and TV and you see in the street a Chinese building road and Europeans working in many so-called humanitarian aid organizations driving Mercedes and BMW in the Chinese made road. What to believe ? What you see or what you heard or read ? “Blessed are those who believe without seeing ” the Bible says but here we can both see and hear.

-Westerners are not stupid, they play all the cards but know which ones can win. They know they are not going to succeed telling to Congolese that Chinese are stealing their minerals if they can see made-by-Chinese roads, rail ways, hospitals,universities and schools. They have heard from long time that their country has got plenty of gold and diamonds and have got nothing from them but their people dying in mines for the past 100 years. Building a hospital and taking tons and tons of gold doesn’t matter for them because they have mined to death for someone else and didn’t see the hospital. What Westerners media haven’t understood is that Africans don’t know the price of natural resources because they have never seen salvation from them. Telling them: “hey look at Chinese they are devouring your diamonds”, doesn’t really produce expected results.

They know that they are doomed to fail and are now seeking for a 1884 Berlin like negotiated solution over the sharing of African resources. They have now to allocate some parts to China and India otherwise they risk loosing all. The “good” idea of not fighting but sharing Africa is again from Germany but not at Berlin but Bonn.

Bellow is a communique for the conferences

**********************

EU-Africa-China: Building PartnershipsBonn, 29th September to 1st October 2008

The EU has announced a “strategic partnership” with China, including issues of global development. Within the EU, Germany is particularly interested in global cooperation with China. The Heiligendamm process determines joint responsibilities for development, especially for Africa, both for G8 and important emerging countries as China.

The EU is still the largest cooperation partner to Sub-Sahara Africa. But China – even though not a new partner to African states – has geared up its presence in Africa with booming direct investments and an active official cooperation policy.

But the crucial factor for Africa’s successful development is African commitment itself.

    • How do African actors perceive the cooperation partners?
    • What are the strengths and weaknesses of European and Chinese development strategies?

Yet, uncertainties remain also with regard to the Chinese and European agenda:

    • What are the principles of the respective cooperation with Africa?
    • What are the players’ practices in specific sectors?
    • Where are the points of entry for trilateral cooperation between Europe, Africa and China?

The workshop invites all participants to an open and constructive debate on their engagement for Africa’s development, on their experiences and perceptions. It is continuing a dialogue between Chinese and German/European officials and academics that has taken place in Beijing in December 2007. The second discussion round in Bonn will include African research partners and policy-makers.

Participation is by invitation only.


***************************

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

India’s development cooperation: Opportunities and challenges for international development cooperation Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE), Bonn
Tulpenfeld 6, 53113 Bonn
27. August 2008

During this workshop, which is part of an Indian-German research project, initiated by the German Ministry for Cooperation and Development (BMZ), the results of this project carried out in cooperation between DIE and the Indian Institute of Foreign Trade (IIFT), New Delhi, India will be presented and discussed.

In particular the study will analyse the following aspects:

    • Experience/foundations of Indian development cooperation
    • India’s role in ensuring regional and cross-regional economic integration
    • India’s assistance to Africa’s development
    • India’s contribution to the future international development agenda

Participation is by invitation only.


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

However if negotiations are not yet finished, the new Bismark is going to have many challenges. China have got good reputation in Africa and Africans are willing more than ever not the right to choose their partners because that’s too demanding maybe, but the right to choose their master is seen as a must have one. They West will need to impose their practices to China what it’s impossible because Chinese will not be welcomed in Africa unless they show themselves different from Westerners. Would you hide from a river in the lake ?

China then is in a good position and has high needs and may ask a big part and why not even asking for the whole thing ? The 1884 Berlin participants didn’t get equal portions. India comes also with not a small appetite and they should wait also Russia because it hasn’t said the last word. How if our Brazilian brothers and Sisters join the game ? Maybe it’s not like football, otherwise they should also think twice.

I would like to attend that meeting because it’s not going to be the 1884 Berlin way for sure.Nothing shocking at all will be said. Partnership in helping Africa will be the main topic for sure and it sounds nice and sweet. There is no doubt that the black continent will be invited to attend. I m afraid the true negotiations will have been somewhere else. Wait and see.

Time will tell.

Daniel

Africa: Is Africa a cold war battleground?

Monday, August 11th, 2008

By Sam Akaki

Thanks to the dwindling primary natural resources, oil and gas, the West is hounding Zimbabwe’s Robert Mugabe and Sudan’s al-Bashir, and heaping blame on Russia and China for protecting them; thus setting the stage for a new Cold War to be fought in Africa.


Africa The last Cold War saw the savage murder or violent overthrow by the British, Americans, Belgians, French and Portuguese of nationalist African leaders including Patrice Lumumba, Dr. Kwame Nkrumah, Luis Cabral, Eduardo Mondlane, Samora Marcel, Milton Obote, Hamed Sekou Toure, Gamel Abdel Nasser and Ahmed Ben Bella who were dubbed terrorists or Russian and Chinese sympathizers.

The lucky ones — Jomo Kenyatta, Robert Mugabe and Nelson Mandela were given long prison sentences from which they were never expected to come out, alive. Today, Mandela’s statue stands as a monument of British cynicism, in Parliament Square, London. The statue stood there for three years until last week when the USA finally removed Mandela’s name from the list of international terrorists!

The human, social and economic wounds inflicted on Africa by the last Cold War are still very raw. Mozambique, Angola and Namibia are littered with millions of land mines and other unexploded military ordinances, which will kill people for centuries to come. Algeria, Ethiopia, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Ivory Coast, Chad, Central African Republic, Nigeria, Sudan and Uganda are fighting self-destruct wars, while Somalia ceased to be a state in 1992, thanks to western weapons.

“China is financing infrastructure projects in more than 35 African countries.”

Overall, the last Cold War left Africa on the life-support machine of western food aid administered by the World Food Program, while their leaders pay lip service to cure the patient.

Recently, the Africa Progress Panel (APP), headed by the former UN Secretary General Kofi Annan, issued a report, “Africa Progress Panel responds to the G8 Summit in Hokkaido” which said:

“G8 countries have done little to show how they will fund the shortfall of U.S.$ 40 billion in programmable aid and debt relief identified by the Africa Progress Panel last month…The G8 has yet to present clear timetables outlining future aid provision or to provide increased transparency required to improve the quality of aid.”

On “Global food crisis”, the report said, “The Panel welcomes the commitment of U.S.$ 10 billion to support food aid and measures to increase agricultural input as a necessary first step… More needs to be done, however, to increase the supply of food to the world’s most vulnerable citizens, and immediate measures must be taken to relax export restrictions on commodities such as rice”

On trade, it said “The Panel welcomes the G8 leaders’ commitment to the conclusion of an ambitious, balanced and comprehensive Doha agreement… As WTO negotiations enter this crucial period, all parties need to understand that the attainment of the Millennium Development Goals rest in large part on the ability of the continent to trade its way out of poverty.”

And in conclusion, Mr. Annan declared “The success in supporting African development will not only result in tangible benefits for her people but ensure a more secure and prosperous future for the world. For G8 leaders, helping Africa to help itself is not a question of altruism; it is a matter of self-interest.”

The July 11 UN resolution accused Robert Mugabe of “killing 100 opposition supporters and displacing 2,000”, and called for punitive sanctions including imposing an arms embargo, a clear signal for attacks on Zimbabwe. Thankfully, China and Russia, which were not at the Berlin Conference, rejected the resolution, saying it would “open the way for interference by the Security Council in internal affairs of Members States, which is a gross violation of the UN Charter.”

To disorganize the AU, the International Criminal Court (ICC), is planning to arrest Sudan’s president, Omar al-Bashir, for “leading a campaign of murder, rape and mass deportation in Darfur”. The plan is advancing despite the AU statement, which “reiterated the AU’s concern with the misuse of indictments against African leaders.”

“The Western ruling groups are conceited, full of themselves, ignorant of our conditions, and they make other people’s business their business.”

Incidentally, the conflict in Darfur started 18 years after the one in northern Uganda which killed over 300,000 civilians, caused the abduction of 20, 000 children and drove 2 million into concentration camps. Yet, the ICC never investigated the role of the Ugandan troops in these atrocities, leave alone issuing an arrest warrant for Museveni.

That is not surprising. The West is less interested in human rights in Africa than in justifying and setting the stage for a new Cold War. The BBC reported on 13th July it “has found the first evidence that China is currently helping Sudan’s government militarily in Darfur.”

Yet, China’s real crime is its dominating investments in Africa which now exceeds British, USA, European Union, World Bank and IMF aid budgets, combined.

A recent World Bank confirmed that China is financing infrastructure projects in more than 35 African countries with Angola, the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), Mozambique, Nigeria, the Sudan, Zambia and Zimbabwe among the biggest recipients. In the DRC, China has agreed to build thousands of kilometers of roads, several hospitals and three universities. Unlike the West, China gives Africa quality projects on time and much more cheaply.

In their most direct statements yet recorded, African leaders made their views about the West clear during the Chinese Africa summit, held in Beijing in November 2006. Speaking to Lindsey Hilsum of British Channel Four television, former president Festus Mogae of Botswana said, “I find that the Chinese treat us as equals. The West treats us as former subjects (read slaves). Which is a reality. I prefer the attitude of the Chinese to that of the West.”

For his part, President Museveni who is seen as a darling of the West said, “The Western ruling groups are conceited, full of themselves, ignorant of our conditions, and they make other people’s business their business. Whereas the Chinese just deal with you, you represent your country, they represent their own interests, and you do business.”

And Russia is an enemy because it is sitting on huge gas and oil reserves, and opposing not only the expansion of North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) to its borders, but also US plans to build Missile Defense facilities in Poland and the Czech Republic.

Given the devastation of the last Cold War, won’t a new one be a double crime against humanity exceeding not only the massacres by the Germans of 6 million Jews, but also the genocide committed by Belgians in Congo in the last centaury, and the slave trade?

Aren’t African leaders facing a simple choice: stand firm and tell the west not to touch al-Bashir, or keep silent and wait to be picked off one by one?

Sam Akaki is Executive Director, Democratic Institutions for Poverty Reduction in Africa (DIPRA).
(The African Executive)

China-Africa: “China is in a position to be in the heart of Africa. And the West? They are losing out.”

Sunday, August 10th, 2008

Wang Gang, a smiling, bespectacled man who goes by the name “Steel,” moved to Senegal from China five years ago and set up a shop in Dakar. He sells footwear, scarves, shawls and an assortment of other low-priced “Made in China” goods.

Although his business is small, he is part of an army of Chinese shopkeepers in Africa that paved the way for big Chinese investors who have funded gigantic infrastructure projects there.

“Long, long ago, my friend came here for business and introduced me to Dakar to sell Chinese products,” says Wang, who adds that his name in Chinese means steel. “I hope I can make a big market in Africa in the future, and maybe I will have good luck.”

Outside in the sweltering Senegalese heat, female shoppers dressed in brightly colored boubous, the traditional voluminous West African gowns, rummage through piles of shiny trinkets and Chinese knickknacks in a market stall.

Adama Gaye, a Senegalese author and commentator, says Chinese merchants were the vanguard of Beijing’s major investment in Africa. These shopkeepers, fanning out over the entire continent, were the pioneers who preceded big business from China. “These people represent a new form of colonialism with an Asian face that is coming to Africa,” Gaye says.

“The influx of Chinese business people onto the streets of Dakar is quite a phenomenon,” Gaye says. “One street, the Boulevard General de Gaulle — named after the French wartime leader — could be called Boulevard Mao Tse-Tung, because it is dominated by the Chinese,” he says with a smile.

China has adopted a subtle approach to wooing Africa — unlike the continent’s original colonial masters. When they came to Africa three centuries ago, they used the barrel of the gun,” Gaye says. “They came with boats, they controlled ports and forts and physically dominated places. The Chinese did it in a soft way.”

The Chinese merchants, he says, were “the advance force that has allowed opening up of new territories, including Senegal, and they were followed up later on by the big companies and then the political leaders.”

These ordinary people became China’s eyes and ears in territories such as Senegal. “They are very useful in the grand strategy that China is deploying across the world,” Gaye says.

But cheap, mass-produced Chinese imports like those that Wang sells are flooding African markets and crippling some local industries, including textiles.Africa cannot compete with the eye-catching Chinese fabrics and African prints that sell at a fraction of the price. Factories are closing down, and jobs are being lost.

But many shoppers in Senegal, like Khady Sall, point out that the Chinese stores are affordable. She fills a bag with headscarves, sandals and perfume — “imitation though,” she says with a laugh, “but cheap.”

With Senegal’s rising cost of living, Sall says, the Chinese goods are an excellent value and suit everyone’s wallet. “Everyone can afford to buy something,” Sall says. “They’re quite cheap and pretty good quality.”

Trade between Africa and China topped more than $55 billion in 2006 — up fivefold since 2000. That’s still well below the more than $70 billion in U.S.-Africa trade. Beijing hopes two-way trade with the continent will hit $100 billion by 2020.

Wang, the Chinese shopkeeper, wants to be part of that boom. He says he expects to spend another few years in Senegal. “We’ll see — maybe one, two, three, four, maybe more if the market is suitable for me. Maybe I can stay here for a long time,” Wang says.

Dozens of Chinese-owned shops and market stalls line a wide avenue in Centenaire, an area of Dakar. Ten years ago, there was only a handful. Wang says the glut of shops has hurt his business. “The competition is more than before — for everything,” he says.

While the influx of Chinese capital might be attractive, Gaye warns that China knows what it wants from Africa and “has come with a strategy.” Africa, he says, has not done the same homework. “There is no strategic continental approach that African countries have adopted,” Gaye says. “No think tank, no task force, no inclusion of Chinese language into universities, no coordinated approach. This should be the role of the African Union.”

“Overall,” Gaye says, “it’s an unbalanced relationship in which China knows what it wants and has a clearly defined agenda. The question, indeed, is what is Africa doing in the face of these challenges?” Gaye says. “Nothing. It’s as if African countries are rushing to China, bowl in hand. And China naturally is in a best position to take advantage, whereas African countries are almost powerless and just expecting China to be the new messiah.”

Gaye compares the renewed global interest in Africa’s raw materials and markets with suitors lining up to court the continent. China, hungry for all the natural resources it can get, is determined to win Africa’s hand, he says.

“China is in a position to be in the heart of Africa,” Gaye says. “And the West? They are losing out. If Africa plays its cards well, I think Africa has never been in a better position.”

But Gaye says it’s up to Africa to make the most of the marriage with China.

China-Africa: Stronger Economic Ties Mean More Migration

Friday, August 8th, 2008

By Malia Politzer

china africa As host of this year’s Summer Olympics, China and its growing influence in the world have received much media attention. China’s business and trade ties to Africa are among the topics that have come under scrutiny, with some questioning whether China is monopolizing Africa’s oil, gas, and mineral resources and in the process supporting governments the West has tried to isolate and “colonizing” the continent.

Since China first established diplomatic ties with some African countries nearly 50 years ago, Chinese-African trade and Chinese presence on the continent has increased exponentially.

In October 2000, the first Forum on China-Africa Cooperation (FOCAC) meeting brought together ministers from China and 44 African countries, representatives from the African and Chinese business communities, and regional and international organizations. This meeting, according to the forum, “charted the direction for the development of a new, stable and long-term partnership.”

The third ministerial meeting, in November 2006, was the largest diplomatic forum in modern Chinese history with representatives from 48 African countries. Among the goals outlined: more high-level dialogue, trade, development assistance for Africa, cultural exchanges, and tourism.

Economic cooperation is clearly working. In 2007, Chinese companies invested a total of US$1 billion in Africa, and two-way trade reached US$73.31 billion, a sevenfold increase since 2000, when the forum was established. Also in 2007, more than 234,000 Chinese traveled to African countries.

These closer ties have precipitated a new wave of migration between the two regions — from China to Africa and from Africa to China —that is only expected to grow as economic ties become stronger.

China-Africa Migration in Perspective

During the Ming Dynasty (1368-1644) the first Chinese ships sailed to Africa. Among the most famous Chinese mariners was Zheng He, who landed on the East African coast and brought back exotic goods as well as animals.

According to legend, one of two Chinese trade vessels sank near the island of Lamu. Survivors are believed to have settled in Kenya and married local Kenyan women. In 2005, Chinese experts “confirmed” a Kenyan girl’s Chinese ancestry, and the Chinese government gave her a scholarship to study medicine in China.

The most well-known Chinese population in Africa is the South African Chinese who date back to the 17th century. The first wave of Chinese immigrants to South Africa was small (only 17 Chinese names were on a convict list dated the year 1724) and consisted largely of convicts and ex-convicts banished from Indonesia to South Africa under Dutch colonial rule.

The Dutch were unable to convince the Dutch East India Company to bring Chinese to South Africa in larger numbers to fill a labor shortage, so Chinese presence remained limited. Chinese convicts who did come over were considered “black” and largely treated as slaves, although some free Chinese did come of their own accord. Those who became free often returned to Asia.

The second small wave of Chinese migration to South Africa occurred when the British took over the South African colony in the early 19th century. The British imported small numbers of Chinese workers to work in public infrastructure and agriculture.

However, there is very little scholarly or empirical research on recent Chinese migration to Africa. Even less data exists on the increasing number of African migrants in China.

The BBC reports the Chinese presence in South Africa to be as large as 200,000. Some Chinese South Africans are descendents of migrant workers who arrived in the late 19th century to work in the gold mines around Johannesburg.

The majority of the current South African Chinese community immigrated from Taiwan — which maintained diplomatic relations with South Africa during apartheid — during the 1980s and 1990s. Many became entrepreneurs. In recent years there have also been increasing numbers of Chinese immigrants from mainland China.

Other long-standing Chinese populations in Africa can be found in Reunion and Madagascar, islands off the southeastern coast of Africa, and Mauritania in western Africa.

Both modern Chinese-African relations and immigration trends have their roots in Chinese international policy under former Chairman Mao Zedong. China’s first official bilateral agreement with African countries took place in 1956 with Egypt, Algeria, Morocco, Sudan, and Guinea, and focused primarily on trade relations.

By the 1960s, 19 African countries had official ties to Beijing. To help cement new diplomatic relations, Mao sent a number of Chinese to the continent in the 1960s, as well as 150,000 technicians between the 1950s and 1970s, to work in agriculture, technology, and infrastructure. Most returned to China after completing their contracts.

In northern Namibia, small Taiwanese businesses emerged as early as the 1970s, and Chinese textile firms were established in the Newcastle region of South Africa and Lesotho around the same time. These businesses established networks that current entrepreneurs still tap into when arriving in Africa.

Current immigration trends are linked more directly to China’s liberalized migration and economic policies in the late 1970s, which permitted Chinese to leave the country and allowed for foreign investment.

Official estimates of the number of Chinese in Africa vary dramatically. Political scientist Sasha Gong reports official numbers to be only 100,000 Chinese workers in Africa — or 15 percent of the total overseas Chinese workforce. About 35 percent of those in Africa work in manufacturing and about 30 percent in construction, with the number of manufacturing jobs decreasing and construction jobs increasing over the past five years. Gong acknowledges that the official number is likely only a fraction of the whole.

An Ohio University database estimates the total number of Chinese in Africa at 137,000, the same figure Taiwan’s government provided in 2001 (Taiwan’s estimate in 2004 was 154,000).

Political scientist Emmanuel Ma Mung estimates the number to be between 270,000 and 520,000, with between 70,000 and 80,000 contract migrants. However, Xinhua, China’s official news agency, estimates the total population to be significantly larger — as many as 750,000 Chinese working or living “for extended periods” on the continent.

In Angola, 2,500 Chinese work for Chinese companies financed by an oil-backed loan China granted to the Angolan government. University of Nairobi economist Francis M. Mwega anticipated a total of 30,000 Chinese workers for the project.

Political scientist Barry Sautman compiled press reports that estimate 1,000 to 3,000 Chinese in Cameroon, 5,000 in Lesotho, and as many as 50,000 in Nigeria (all estimates are for 2005). According to the Southern African Migration Project at Queens University, as of 2006 there were as many as 40,000 Chinese in Namibia on work visas and residence permits.

In a 2007 New York Times article, Chad Chamber of Commerce Director Renaud Dinguemnaial estimated an “influx of at least 40,000 Chinese in coming years” to Chad.

Perhaps one of the most telling signs of increased migration between the two regions is the rising number of weekly flights between China and Africa. In 2007, Chinese airlines began launching one flight per week between Beijing and Lagos, Nigeria’s largest city.

Currently, three Chinese air companies offer routes to Africa: China Southern Airlines, China Eastern Airlines, and Hainan Airlines, which offers nonstop flights from Beijing to Cairo three times per week and a route from Beijing to Johannesburg via Guangzhou twice per week.

In July 2008, Emirates airline also began offering six flights per week to Guanghzhou, with connections in Dubai for those coming from Cape Town, Lagos, Cairo, Addis Ababa, and Nairobi.

Trends in Chinese Immigration to Africa

Modern Chinese immigrants to Africa can be divided into roughly four different categories: temporary labor migrants linked to Chinese development work in Africa, small-time entrepreneurs, in-transit migrants, and agricultural workers. There is also rising tourist traffic to the continent.

The largest of these four categories is undoubtedly temporary labor migration. Official Chinese government sources indicate 800 Chinese companies operating in 49 countries throughout Africa, where they work in infrastructure, public works, oil, and mining operations. These companies often rely heavily on Chinese migrant labor although they also hire Africans. Migrants generally stay for the duration of the contract and return to China.

Entrepreneurs are also a growing presence. Numerous international newspapers report Chinese setting up restaurants and selling a variety of goods, from ice cream to bicycles to clothing and electronics, in a variety of African countries. Such entrepreneurs come both directly from mainland China, as well as from Hong Kong, Taiwan, and various other Chinese migrant communities — notably France, Italy, and Spain.

According to research and press reports, these entrepreneurs tend to cluster in one part of a city, catering to locals and possibly planting the seeds of future Chinatowns (which in Europe, North America, and Oceania/Asia are home to both Chinese immigrants and businesses). In Dakar, Senegal, Chinese shops line the Boulevard Charles de Gaulle, and in Kampala, Uganda, a “baby Chinatown” (so named by Chinese journalism students this spring) is emerging on Williams Street.

In 2002-2003, geographers Jorgen Carling and Heidi Hauben examined Chinese entrepreneurs in Cape Verde, a former Portuguese colony off the coast of West Africa. The wave of Chinese entrepreneurs began in 1995, when the first Chinese shop opened.

Carling and Hauben found that newcomers often opened their own shops after working for another entrepreneur. Competition among an increasing number of Chinese shop owners, which also occurred in Eastern European countries in the 1990s, caused shop owners to drop their prices, expand their presence to other areas of the country, and, in some cases, leave for countries like Angola and Mozambique, where fewer Chinese meant less competition.

Africa is also drawing more and more workers from rural China. In a 2007 speech, Li Ruogu, the head of China’s Export-Import Bank, urged poor farmers to move to Africa, promising to support migration with investment, project development, and help with the sale of products. “There’s no harm in allowing [Chinese] farmers to leave the country to become farm owners [in Africa],” he observed in a BBC interview in 2007.

According to Liu Jianjun of the China-Africa Business Council, a Chinese firm that primarily seeks to identify agricultural business ventures in Africa, several thousand Chinese farmers have already taken advantage of this opportunity. His organization has helped thousands of farmers from Baoding in Hebei Province find work in Kenya, Uganda, Ghana, and Senegal over the past few years.

The group of migrants hardest to document are Chinese migrants in transit to other regions, often Europe or even North America. These migrants generally enter on legal tourist or business visas, then overstay.

Because of their informal status, it is very difficult to estimate the total number of in-transit migrants. Some, according to Ma Mung, are able to find work with Chinese compatriots while in Africa — becoming street vendors, delivery men, fritter-sellers, etc. — and others even eventually legally establish themselves, finding full-time work as entrepreneurs or tradesmen.

Generally speaking, Chinese migrants to Africa still come from long-standing points of origin, namely Southern provinces such as Guangdon, Fujian, and Zhejiang, according to Ma Mung. Since the 1990s, however, those from cities such as Beijing, Tianjin, and Shanghai have migrated, in particular entrepreneurs. The number of migrants from the Dongbei region, Lianing, and Hubei in central China has also increased.

According to Gong, (both official and unofficial) Chinese migrants use four methods to travel to Africa.

The first method is through government-to-government agreements, which send professionals and laborers for training; few migrants use this route.

The majority of temporary migrants use a second method: government-licensed private employment agencies that find and recruit workers. These agencies help workers obtain proper visas and travel documents.

Most workers hired by agencies end up working in government-run projects such as railway and highway construction, oil fields, and mines. By the end of 2005, there were 1,609 such licensed agencies throughout China, most operating out of Beijng, Sandong, Jiangsu, Liaoning, and Shanghai according to Gong.

A third method comprises informal social networks, such as relatives or other personal connections, and illegal or semilegal unlicensed employment agencies. Such agencies often charge very high fees — sometimes as much as a year’s earnings — and often make false promises to potential migrants about wages and benefits.

Those who cannot obtain legal means go through “snakeheads,” or human smugglers. Although there is little information available on specific routes through Africa, smugglers have been known to charge as much as $25,000 per person for Chinese going to Europe and $30,000 to smuggle Chinese to the United States.

Trends in African Migration to China

Despite scarce reliable statistics on African migration to China, few doubt the trend is growing. In a recent interview with Foreign Policy, J. Stephen Morrison, head of the Africa program at Washington’s Center for Strategic and International Studies, said there will “..certainly…[be] an increase in [African] migration in the direction of China, because China is offering opportunities to increase life chances, skills, and income.”

Unlike Chinese migrants to Africa, African immigrants to China tend to be highly educated. The three main types of African migrants to China are businessmen, students, and English teachers.

Perhaps the largest group of Africans in China is businessmen. A Nigerian Embassy spokesman estimated that Nigerians possibly make up the largest group of Africans in China, with about 2,000 to 3,000 Nigerians in Guangdong in 2006. Most businessmen only stay temporarily.

Although accurate data is difficult to come by, Sautman estimates there are about 10,000 Africans — mostly businessmen — in Guangzhou alone. However, a report in the Guangzhou Daily estimates as many as 100,000 Africans in Guangzhou, a number that the newspaper reports has been increasing at an annual rate of 30 to 40 percent since 2003. One district of 10 square kilometers in Guangzhou, Hongqioa, has earned the nicknames “Chocolate City” and “Little Africa” among local Chinese, according to one Guangzhou newspaper report.

Estimates of the number of Africans living in larger cities — Beijing and Shanghai, for example — have risen from hundreds to thousands over the past 10 years, according to Sautman. Many of these businessmen are interested in buying cheap Chinese goods they can sell in African markets. Others come to China to facilitate trade in raw materials, primarily oil and minerals.

Students are another significant migrant group. According to the Chinese Ministry of Education, China has provided more than 17,000 scholarships to students from 50 African countries since the 1950s. According to ministry statistics, 3,737 African students studied in China in 2006, 40 percent more than in 2005.

Despite these increases, however, African students only constitute 2.3 percent of the total student body at Chinese universities. At the 2006 Africa-China Summit, Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao promised to increase the number of scholarships 20-fold, from 200 to 4,000 annually.

An increasing number of African English instructors, most of whom come from anglophone African countries such as Ghana and Kenya, teach in Chinese schools, according to Tongkeh Fowale, a consultant and teacher living in China who has published articles on African migration to China for American Chronicle.

Perhaps the smallest group of Africans is composed of entrepreneurs who work in informal markets and deal drugs. However, they frequently receive the most press coverage in local Chinese media outlets, and they are the number-one target of Chinese law enforcement, according to Fowale.

As more Africans become educated in Chinese language and culture, more are likely to migrate to China. Currently, more than 120 schools in 16 African countries offer Chinese-language courses, and six Beijing-sponsored Confucian Institutes offer Chinese language and culture courses.

Conclusion

As the economies of China and African countries become more integrated, the movement of students, business people, and temporary workers will grow.

However, history shows that permanent settlement brings integration challenges. For instance, Chinese in South Africa faced discriminatory laws throughout the 20th century. They did not get the right to vote until after apartheid ended in 1994.

In addition, African countries have a history of cracking down on foreigners deemed an economic threat to natives, most notably the expulsion of Asian Indians from Kenya, Uganda, and Tanzania in the 1960s and 1970s and the recent xenophobic attacks in South Africa.

African countries could also opt to limit immigration from China. Although Cape Verde was considering such a measure at the time of Carling and Hauben’s paper, published in 2004, the Cape Verdean government now sees the Chinese shops as a benefit to the local economy.

With more Africans living and working in China, China most likely will have to confront integration issues. Already, as noted earlier, Africans in China receive disproportionately negative media attention.

Perhaps African and Chinese leaders could recognize such obstacles and place migration issues on the agenda of future ministerial meetings, allowing them to build on the progress they have made in other economic and social areas.

Africa: French Accused in Rwandan Genocide

Thursday, August 7th, 2008

By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

genocide The government of Rwanda issued a report accusing senior French officials on Tuesday of involvement in the 1994 genocide that killed 800,000 people, naming a former president, François Mitterrand, and a former prime minister, Dominique de Villepin, as among those involved. The French Foreign Ministry said officials were reviewing the accusations. French officials were accused in the report of giving political, military, diplomatic and logistical support during the genocide to Rwanda’s extremist government and the Hutu forces that slaughtered minority Tutsis and politically moderate Hutus. “French soldiers themselves directly were involved in assassinations of Tutsis and Hutus accused of hiding Tutsis,” said the report, which was compiled by a team of investigators from the Justice Ministry